Real-Time PCR
Real-time PCR, or qPCR, is a molecular technique used to amplify and detect nucleic acids while the reaction is taking place. Fluorescent signals are monitored during each amplification cycle, allowing target DNA or RNA to be detected quickly and accurately.
In infectious disease diagnostics, real-time PCR can be used to detect DNA from microorganisms or, after a reverse transcription step, RNA from pathogens directly from suitable clinical samples.
qPCR monitors the amplification of DNA in real time, while RT-qPCR includes a reverse transcription step to convert RNA into complementary DNA (cDNA) before amplification.
RT-qPCR is therefore commonly used to detect RNA viruses and other RNA targets.
The term RT-PCR may sometimes be used for reverse transcription PCR, so the specific technique should always be clear from the context.
The Ct (cycle threshold) or Cq (quantification cycle) value indicates the PCR cycle at which the amplification signal reaches a defined detection threshold.
Within the same assay and under the same conditions, a lower Ct value generally corresponds to a higher initial amount of target nucleic acid, while a higher Ct value is usually associated with a lower amount.
Ct values should always be interpreted according to the specific assay criteria and together with the performance of the assay controls.
Not necessarily. Ct values should not be directly compared between different assays, instruments or protocols without appropriate evaluation.
Ct values can be influenced by several factors, including:
- Assay design
- Amplification efficiency
- Real-time PCR instrument
- Threshold settings
- Sample preparation
- Extraction method
- Data analysis parameters
For this reason, the same Ct value does not necessarily represent the same target concentration across different PCR systems.
Multiplex PCR allows several genetic targets to be detected simultaneously within a single PCR reaction.
By combining different primers, probes and fluorescence channels, one assay can detect multiple microorganisms or genetic markers at the same time.
Multiplex PCR is particularly useful for syndromic testing, where different pathogens can cause similar clinical symptoms.
VIRPLEX includes multiplex solutions for areas such as respiratory, gastrointestinal, sexually transmitted and other infectious diseases.
Qualitative PCR determines whether a target nucleic acid is detected or not detected, while quantitative PCR estimates the amount of target nucleic acid present in the sample.
Qualitative assays are commonly used for pathogen detection, whereas quantitative assays may be used when measuring the amount of target has clinical or laboratory relevance.
The appropriate approach depends on the microorganism, application and intended use of the assay.
VIRPLEX is Vircell’s range of real-time PCR assays for the molecular diagnosis of infectious diseases.
The VIRPLEX portfolio includes assays for different diagnostic areas, including:
- Respiratory infections
- Gastrointestinal infections
- Sexually transmitted infections
- Mycobacterial infections
- Central nervous system infections
- Zoonotic and vector-borne diseases
VIRPLEX reagents are available in different formats to adapt to different laboratory workflows and sample volumes.
The compatible sample type depends on the specific VIRPLEX assay and the pathogen being detected.
Depending on the assay, validated clinical specimens may include:
- Nasopharyngeal swabs
- Oropharyngeal swabs
- Bronchoalveolar lavage
- Sputum
- Saliva
- Serum
- Plasma
- Stool
- Urine
- Vaginal, endocervical, urethral or rectal swabs
- Cerebrospinal fluid
Laboratories should always refer to the Instructions for Use of the specific assay to confirm validated sample types and handling requirements.
The extraction requirements depend on the specific VIRPLEX assay and sample type.
For workflows that require nucleic acid extraction, Vircell offers extraction solutions as well as MagXtract® 3200, which can automate nucleic acid extraction and PCR setup.
The Instructions for Use of each VIRPLEX assay should always be followed when selecting and validating the extraction procedure.
Yes. VIRPLEX assays include internal controls to monitor critical stages of the analytical process.
Depending on the assay design, the internal control can help identify problems such as:
- PCR inhibition
- Inadequate sample quality
- Nucleic acid degradation
- Extraction failures
- Incorrect reaction setup
The internal control must always be interpreted according to the criteria defined for the specific VIRPLEX assay.
VIRPLEX assays use lyophilized reagents to support reagent stability and simplify handling and transportation.
Depending on the product format, VIRPLEX solutions may include lyophilized master mix and positive controls, as well as pre-dispensed formats designed to reduce manual preparation steps.
VIRPLEX assays use lyophilized reagents to support reagent stability and simplify handling and transportation.
Depending on the product format, VIRPLEX solutions may include lyophilized master mix and positive controls, as well as pre-dispensed formats designed to reduce manual preparation steps.
Depending on the assay, VIRPLEX kits are available in different formats, including vials, pre-dispensed strips (-LP) and divisible low-profile plates (-LPD).
The -LPD format allows laboratories to separate the plate into strips and use only the wells required for each PCR run.
The formats available depend on the specific VIRPLEX assay.
VIRPLEX assays are designed for use with commonly available real-time PCR platforms, although compatibility depends on the fluorescence channels and technical requirements of each assay.
Compatible systems may include platforms such as:
- Bio-Rad CFX96™
- Bio-Rad CFX96™ Opus
- Azure Cielo™ 6
Laboratories should always verify instrument compatibility for the specific VIRPLEX assay they intend to use.
Yes. VIRPLEX assays can be integrated into an automated molecular workflow using MagXtract® 3200 and VIRCOM PCR.
MagXtract® 3200 automates nucleic acid extraction and PCR setup, while VIRCOM PCR supports assay configuration, analysis, interpretation and result communication.
Together, these solutions can help maintain traceability from the original sample through to the final result.
VIRCOM PCR is Vircell’s middleware software for managing VIRPLEX molecular assays from PCR setup to result interpretation and reporting.
VIRCOM PCR can support:
- Assay and plate setup
- Amplification curve visualization
- Ct value review
- Automatic result interpretation
- Control management
- Result validation
- Report generation
- Sample, reagent and lot traceability
It can also connect the molecular workflow with compatible real-time PCR instruments and laboratory information systems.
Yes. VIRCOM PCR can connect the molecular workflow to the laboratory information system (LIS).
The software supports bidirectional communication and different communication formats, helping laboratories transfer sample information and results between the molecular workflow and their LIS.
This can reduce manual data entry and improve traceability.
Yes, compatible VIRPLEX assays can be combined within the same PCR run when they use a compatible PCR protocol.
VIRCOM PCR can manage the setup and interpretation of different VIRPLEX assays within the same workflow, helping laboratories adapt each plate to their actual testing needs.
No. The regulatory status may vary between VIRPLEX products.
Depending on the assay and reference, products may have different regulatory classifications, including CE-IVDR, CE or RUO (Research Use Only) status.
The regulatory status and commercial availability of a specific product should always be checked on the product page and in the latest product documentation.
An internal PCR control is a control target included in the analytical process to verify that the test has performed as expected.
Depending on the assay design, internal controls can help laboratories identify:
- PCR inhibition
- Extraction failure
- Sample quality issues
- Reagent problems
- Incorrect reaction setup
The internal control result should be evaluated together with the target result before a sample is validated.
An internal control is included within the assay to monitor the performance of an individual sample or reaction, while an external molecular control is processed independently to monitor the performance of the assay or laboratory workflow.
Third-party external molecular controls provide an independent way to monitor analytical performance without relying exclusively on controls supplied by the assay manufacturer.
AMPLIRUN® controls are designed as independent molecular controls and may be used with compatible molecular assays, including assays from different manufacturers.
Compatibility depends on whether the target sequence, matrix and intended application are appropriate for the assay being evaluated.
Laboratories should select the control according to the target organism, molecular method and purpose of the quality control procedure.
PCR inhibition occurs when substances in the clinical sample or introduced during sample processing interfere with nucleic acid extraction or amplification.
Possible inhibitors may include:
- Mucus
- Blood components
- Hemoglobin
- Heparin
- Certain transport media
- Excess cellular material
- Residues from the extraction process
An internal control can help identify potential inhibition before a result is reported.
A higher-than-expected Ct value may reflect a lower amount of target nucleic acid, but it can also result from pre-analytical or analytical factors.
Possible causes include:
- Low target concentration
- Poor sample quality
- Nucleic acid degradation
- Inefficient extraction
- Partial PCR inhibition
- Reagent or pipetting variation
- Instrument performance
- Sample collection conditions
Late Ct values should therefore be interpreted together with assay controls and according to the criteria established in the assay Instructions for Use.
An invalid PCR result means that the assay criteria required to reliably interpret the sample have not been met.
Possible causes include:
- PCR inhibition
- Internal control failure
- Extraction failure
- Reagent degradation
- Incorrect reaction setup
- Instrument problems
- Sample handling issues
When an invalid result occurs, laboratories should follow the troubleshooting and repeat-testing procedure defined in the assay Instructions for Use.
A negative target result cannot usually be considered valid if the internal control fails when that control is expected to be detected.
Internal control failure may indicate inhibition, extraction failure, poor sample quality or another technical issue.
The sample should be evaluated according to the specific assay interpretation criteria before a negative result is reported.
PCR contamination can be reduced by separating workflow stages and minimizing the transfer of nucleic acids or amplified products between samples and laboratory areas.
Common measures include:
- Unidirectional workflow
- Separation of pre-amplification and post-amplification areas
- Dedicated equipment and consumables
- Routine cleaning and decontamination
- Appropriate personal protective equipment
- Correct pipetting practices
- Negative controls in each run
Automation can also reduce manual handling during selected stages of molecular testing.
PCR reagents should always be stored according to the conditions specified in the product Instructions for Use.
Storage requirements can vary between reagents and assays. Important factors may include:
- Storage temperature
- Protection from light
- Avoiding repeated freeze-thaw cycles
- Monitoring refrigerator and freezer temperatures
- Maintaining appropriate transport conditions
Incorrect storage can affect amplification efficiency, Ct consistency and overall assay performance.
Clinical samples should be stored and transported according to the requirements of the specific assay and sample type.
Whenever possible, samples should be processed within the recommended timeframe after collection.
Temperature, transport medium, storage duration and repeated freeze-thaw cycles can affect nucleic acid integrity and PCR performance, particularly for RNA targets.
Under ISO 15189:2022, laboratories should verify that a validated examination procedure achieves the required performance specifications before introducing it into routine use.
The scope of verification should be appropriate to the intended use of the assay, its complexity and the laboratory's quality management requirements.
Depending on the method, verification may evaluate relevant performance characteristics such as precision, reproducibility, analytical sensitivity or other parameters required to demonstrate that the assay performs as expected in the laboratory.
Verification procedures, results and conclusions should be documented.
AMPLIRUN® and AMPLIRUN® TOTAL external molecular controls can be used as tools within PCR assay verification and ongoing quality monitoring processes.
AMPLIRUN® can support the evaluation of amplification and detection performance, while AMPLIRUN® TOTAL can monitor a broader workflow including nucleic acid extraction.
However, using a specific control does not by itself demonstrate compliance with ISO 15189. Each laboratory must define and document its verification and quality control strategy according to its own accreditation requirements.
Documentation available for VIRPLEX assays may include:
- Instructions for Use
- Analytical performance information
- Sensitivity data
- Specificity data
- Precision information
- Product documentation
- Scientific and technical resources
Laboratories should always use the latest documentation for the specific product reference when evaluating assay performance, sample compatibility and verification requirements.
Serology and Immunodiagnostics
Serology is the study and detection of antibodies and, in some assays, antigens in biological samples to provide information about an infection or the immune response to a microorganism.
In infectious disease diagnostics, serological tests can help identify recent or previous exposure, assess immune status and complement other diagnostic methods.
Their clinical value and interpretation depend on the microorganism, the marker being tested, the timing of sample collection and the clinical context.
A serological test can detect specific antibodies, such as IgM or IgG, or certain antigens associated with a microorganism.
The marker being detected depends on the disease and the purpose of the assay. Some tests look for antibodies produced by the immune system, while others directly detect an antigen from the microorganism.
For this reason, not all serological tests provide the same clinical information.
Serology mainly evaluates the immune response to an infection, whereas PCR directly detects the genetic material of the microorganism.
PCR can be particularly useful when the pathogen is present in the sample and its DNA or RNA needs to be detected. Serology, on the other hand, can provide information about the antibody response that develops after exposure.
The most appropriate technique depends on the microorganism and the stage of infection. In some diseases, molecular and serological methods can be complementary.
Serology is particularly useful when the detection of antibodies or antigens provides relevant information about infection, previous exposure or immune status.
Depending on the disease, serological testing may be used to:
- Support the diagnosis of a recent infection.
- Identify previous exposure.
- Assess specific aspects of immune status.
- Compare acute and convalescent samples.
- Complement molecular or microbiological testing.
- Support epidemiological and seroprevalence studies.
The specific use of serology should always be considered according to the microorganism and clinical situation.
Serum and plasma are the most commonly used samples for infectious disease serology.
However, accepted sample types depend on the specific assay. Laboratories should always check the Instructions for Use to confirm which specimen types have been validated.
Many VirClia® assays from Vircell, for example, are designed for the detection of antibodies in human serum or plasma.
IgM and IgG are different classes of antibodies whose appearance and persistence can provide different information about the immune response to an infection.
In many infections, IgM may appear during the earlier stages of the immune response, while IgG usually develops later and may remain detectable for a longer period.
However, this pattern is not universal. IgM and IgG kinetics vary depending on the microorganism, previous exposure, vaccination and the individual immune response.
No. A positive IgM result does not by itself confirm an acute or recent infection.
Although IgM may appear during the early stages of many infections, it can sometimes persist for extended periods, show cross-reactivity or produce false-positive results.
IgM results should therefore be interpreted according to the microorganism, the timing of sample collection, symptoms, epidemiological history and, when appropriate, other laboratory findings.
Not necessarily. The presence of IgG may reflect a past infection, previous exposure or, for some diseases, a response to vaccination.
IgG antibodies can remain detectable for months, years or even longer depending on the microorganism and the individual immune response.
For this reason, an isolated positive IgG result should not automatically be interpreted as evidence of active infection.
Not necessarily. A positive serological result means that the marker targeted by the assay has been detected, but its clinical significance depends on the type of marker and the disease.
Antibody detection may reflect a recent infection, a past infection or a previous immune response. Antigen detection assays may provide different information.
Results should always be interpreted according to the criteria of the specific test and the clinical context.
Yes. Serological testing can be negative during the early stages of an infection if the patient has not yet developed detectable levels of antibodies.
This period is often referred to as the serological window period.
Depending on the microorganism and clinical suspicion, a repeat sample may be required later, or another diagnostic method such as molecular testing may be more appropriate.
Seroconversion is the change from a seronegative to a seropositive status for a specific antibody between two different points in time.
It can be demonstrated by testing samples collected at different stages of infection. Depending on the microorganism and testing method, a significant rise in antibody titre between acute and convalescent samples may also provide useful evidence.
Seroconversion can support the diagnosis of a recent infection when this criterion is established for the specific disease.
A serological test may need to be repeated when the first sample was collected too early or when a change in the antibody response needs to be demonstrated.
A follow-up sample may help identify:
- Seroconversion.
- Antibodies that were not detectable in the initial sample.
- Significant changes in antibody titres.
- Evolution of the immune response.
The appropriate interval between samples depends on the disease and the recommendations for the specific assay.
IgG avidity measures the overall strength with which IgG antibodies bind to their target antigens.
Following a primary infection, antibody affinity can mature over time. Therefore, in certain infections, low IgG avidity may be associated with a more recent primary infection, while high avidity may be more consistent with an older exposure.
Interpretation depends on the microorganism and the assay being used.
An IgG avidity test can help distinguish a recent primary infection from an older exposure in certain diseases, but it cannot precisely date an infection in every case.
Its usefulness depends on the microorganism, the maturation of the immune response and the characteristics of the assay.
Avidity testing is particularly useful in selected infectious diseases where distinguishing recent from past infection has clinical relevance.
Distinguishing a recent infection from a past infection usually requires evaluating the overall antibody pattern rather than relying on a single result.
Depending on the disease, laboratories may consider:
- IgM detection.
- IgG detection and evolution.
- Seroconversion.
- Changes in antibody titres.
- IgG avidity.
- Paired acute and convalescent samples.
These patterns should not be generalized across all infectious diseases. Interpretation must follow the specific criteria established for the microorganism and assay.
A false-positive serological result occurs when an assay produces a positive signal even though the condition being tested for is not actually present.
Possible causes include:
- Cross-reactivity with related microorganisms.
- Heterophile antibodies.
- Immunological interference.
- Non-specific reactions.
- Assay-specific characteristics.
- Testing in populations with a very low pre-test probability of infection.
Unexpected positive results may therefore require confirmation using clinical information or additional laboratory tests.
Cross-reactivity occurs when an antibody reacts with an antigen that is similar to, but different from, the antigen that originally triggered the immune response.
This can occur between closely related microorganisms that share antigenic structures and may complicate the interpretation of certain serological tests.
The relevance of cross-reactivity depends on the microorganism and assay design.
Yes. Antibodies can remain detectable after an infection has resolved.
The duration varies depending on the microorganism, antibody class and individual immune response. In some cases, antibodies may persist for months or years.
For this reason, detecting antibodies does not necessarily mean that the microorganism is still present or that the infection is active.
Yes. For some diseases, vaccination can generate antibodies that may later be detected by serological tests.
The significance of the result depends on the assay, the antigen being detected and the patient’s vaccination history.
Vaccination history should therefore be considered when interpreting relevant serological results.
Serological results should not be interpreted in isolation because the presence or absence of antibodies can have different meanings depending on the timing and context of infection.
Interpretation may depend on:
- Onset and duration of symptoms.
- Epidemiological exposure.
- Immune status.
- Vaccination history.
- Timing of sample collection.
- Results from other diagnostic tests.
- Previous serological results.
Combining laboratory findings with the clinical context helps assign the correct significance to the result.
Serological interpretation can be influenced by pre-analytical, analytical and clinical factors.
These include:
- Timing of sample collection.
- Individual immune response.
- Immunosuppression.
- Previous vaccination.
- Previous exposure to the same or related microorganisms.
- Cross-reactivity.
- Assay sensitivity and specificity.
- The antibody or antigen being detected.
Results should therefore always be interpreted according to the validated criteria of the specific assay.
CLIA, ELISA and IFA are immunodiagnostic techniques that detect antigen-antibody interactions using different detection systems.
- CLIA uses a chemiluminescent signal and can support a high degree of automation.
- ELISA typically uses an enzyme reaction to generate a measurable signal.
- IFA uses fluorescent-labelled antibodies and requires fluorescence microscopy to evaluate the reaction pattern.
There is no single technique that is best for every application. The most appropriate method depends on the microorganism, laboratory workload, required level of automation and diagnostic purpose.
Vircell’s immunology portfolio includes CLIA, ELISA and IFA solutions for different infectious disease testing needs.
The most appropriate serological technique depends on the infection being investigated and the needs of the laboratory.
CLIA can be particularly useful for automated workflows and laboratories requiring flexibility across different parameters. ELISA is a well-established format that can support batch-based processing. IFA remains valuable for certain microorganisms where antibody patterns or titres provide relevant diagnostic information.
The technique should therefore be selected according to the diagnostic application rather than the technology alone.
An external serological control is an independent material used to monitor the analytical performance and processing of an immunodiagnostic assay.
Unlike controls included within the diagnostic kit itself, an external control can provide an independent assessment of the testing process and help laboratories identify variations associated with instruments, reagents, operators or analytical runs.
External controls can form part of a laboratory’s quality control strategy.
Vircell offers a range of immunodiagnostic technologies for infectious disease testing, designed to meet different laboratory needs and workflows.
The portfolio includes:
- VirClia®: automated CLIA immunoassays in Monotest format.
- ELISA: enzyme immunoassays for antibody detection.
- IFA: indirect immunofluorescence assays for viruses, bacteria, parasites and fungi.
- DFA: direct immunofluorescence assays.
- BRUCELLACAPT® and Rose Bengal: solutions for the serological diagnosis of brucellosis.
- VIRapid®: rapid tests for selected applications.
- External immunological controls.
Vircell has more than 30 years of experience in infectious disease diagnostics, with an in-house portfolio covering both immunodiagnostics and molecular diagnostics.
Yes. Vircell offers VirClia® Lotus for the automated processing of VirClia® infectious disease serology assays.
VirClia® Lotus combines the Monotest format with random access and continuous loading, allowing laboratories to add different samples and reagents during the routine and prioritize urgent samples using the STAT function.
The system is designed to support a flexible infectious disease serology workflow without requiring traditional batch processing.
Yes. Vircell offers external immunological controls designed to provide independent monitoring of selected immunodiagnostic processes.
One example is VIRCELL® ASPERGILLUS GALACTOMANNAN Ag CONTROL, an unassayed external control formulated in human serum for assays detecting Aspergillus fumigatus galactomannan antigen.
It is designed to support monitoring of sample processing and the analytical phase of galactomannan detection assays.
ELISA
ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) is an immunoassay technique used to detect antibodies or antigens through an enzyme reaction that produces a measurable signal.
In infectious disease diagnostics, ELISA is mainly used to analyze antibody responses against different microorganisms in samples such as serum or plasma.
The technique allows multiple samples to be processed in a microplate format and can be performed manually or using automated systems. Vircell ELISA kits are specifically developed for infectious disease serology.
An ELISA test detects the interaction between an antigen and an antibody and converts this binding into a measurable colorimetric signal.
In an indirect ELISA, antibodies present in the patient sample bind to antigens attached to the surface of the well. After unbound components are removed through washing, an enzyme-labelled conjugate and a substrate are added.
In Vircell ELISA assays using TMB, the reaction initially produces a blue color that changes to yellow after the stop solution is added. The resulting signal is measured and interpreted according to the specific criteria of the assay.
ELISA assays can detect different classes of antibodies, including IgG, IgM and IgA, depending on the microorganism and the diagnostic purpose of the test.
Vircell’s ELISA portfolio includes assays for different areas of infectious disease diagnostics, including respiratory infections, TORCH infections, vaccine-preventable diseases, vector-borne diseases, sexually transmitted infections, zoonoses and gastrointestinal infections.
ELISA and CLIA are both immunoassay techniques used to detect antigen-antibody interactions, but they use different systems to generate and measure the analytical signal.
ELISA typically uses an enzyme-based colorimetric reaction in a microplate format, while CLIA uses a chemiluminescent signal.
Within Vircell’s portfolio, ELISA provides a microplate-based solution suitable for manual or automated workflows, while VirClia® uses CLIA technology in a Monotest format, allowing individual tests to be processed with greater workflow flexibility.
The most suitable option depends on laboratory workload, testing volume and workflow requirements.
ELISA can be particularly suitable for laboratories that want to process multiple samples using a microplate-based workflow.
The individual break-apart wells used in Vircell ELISA kits allow laboratories to adapt the number of wells used to the actual workload, while compatibility with automated ELISA systems supports different laboratory configurations.
For laboratories that need to process individual tests without waiting for a batch, a Monotest solution such as VirClia® may provide a different workflow approach.
Vircell ELISA kits are enzyme immunoassays designed to detect antibodies against different infectious agents in human serum and plasma samples.
The range is designed to simplify routine processing through features such as:
- Ready-to-use reagents.
- Color-coded plates.
- Individual break-apart wells.
- No separate sample predilution step.
- Semi-quantitative protocols for selected assays.
- μ-Capture technology in selected IgM assays.
- G/M formats that allow IgG and/or IgM testing.
- Compatibility with automated ELISA systems.
Vircell offers a broad ELISA menu for antibody detection against microorganisms associated with different infectious diseases.
The portfolio includes assays for:
- Respiratory infections.
- TORCH infections.
- Vaccine-preventable diseases.
- Vector-borne diseases.
- Sexually transmitted infections.
- Zoonotic diseases.
- Gastrointestinal infections.
- Mononucleosis and other infectious diseases.
The available targets include microorganisms such as Chlamydophila pneumoniae, Legionella pneumophila, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, cytomegalovirus, rubella virus, Toxoplasma gondii, Epstein-Barr virus, Helicobacter pylori and dengue virus, among others.
Vircell ELISA kits are designed for testing human serum and plasma samples.
The exact sample requirements, collection conditions and storage recommendations should always be checked in the Instructions for Use of the specific assay.
Vircell ELISA kits are designed so that a separate sample predilution step is not required.
When dilution or sorbent treatment is needed, it can be performed directly in the well, simplifying sample preparation and reducing additional manual steps.
The G/M format allows the same ELISA kit to be used for different combinations of IgG and IgM determinations.
This gives laboratories greater flexibility to adapt plate usage to their actual testing needs instead of using a format dedicated to only one immunoglobulin class.
μ-Capture is an ELISA format in which IgM antibodies from the patient sample are captured directly by anti-human IgM antibodies attached to the well.
This approach is used in selected IgM assays and can help reduce certain interferences associated with other antibodies present in the sample.
Vircell uses μ-Capture technology in selected IgM assays, including several TORCH and other infectious disease parameters.
Vircell ELISA SORBENT is an auxiliary reagent designed to capture human IgG and reduce potential interference in selected IgM or IgA ELISA assays.
It is based on goat anti-human IgG serum specific for the Fc region and should be used according to the requirements of the corresponding Vircell ELISA assay.
Vircell provides several auxiliary components for its ELISA assays, including:
- ELISA SORBENT, for selected IgM and IgA assays.
- SERUM DILUENT, for sample dilution.
- WASH BUFFER, for washing steps.
These products are designed for use with the corresponding Vircell ELISA kits.
Yes. Vircell ELISA kits are designed to be compatible with automated ELISA processing systems.
Automation can help reduce manual handling and standardize steps such as pipetting, incubation, washing and plate reading.
The specific configuration must be adapted to the assay and instrument being used and should always follow the conditions described in the Instructions for Use.
Yes. Vircell ELISA assays can be integrated into either manual or automated laboratory workflows.
Ready-to-use liquid reagents and individual break-apart wells help laboratories adapt each plate to the number of samples that need to be processed.
Break-apart wells allow laboratories to use only the number of wells required for each run instead of processing an entire microplate.
This helps adapt the assay to the actual daily workload and can reduce unnecessary use of wells.
Vircell ELISA plates also use color coding to facilitate plate and reagent identification during processing.
The recommended shaking speed depends on the type of shaker and should provide sufficient mixing without causing splashing or cross-contamination between wells.
As a reference, Vircell has obtained suitable results at approximately 900 rpm using a vortex-type shaker with a plate adapter and around 300 rpm using an orbital shaker.
After shaking, liquid should not remain attached to the adhesive film covering the plate. The specific assay conditions should always be checked in the Instructions for Use.
ELISA reagents should always be stored under the conditions specified in the Instructions for Use of the individual kit.
Temperature, light exposure, time outside recommended storage conditions and other factors may affect reagent performance.
For this reason, a single general storage condition should not be applied to all ELISA assays.
Samples should be stored according to the specimen type and the conditions specified in the Instructions for Use of the assay.
Storage temperature, duration and repeated freeze-thaw cycles can affect sample integrity and therefore the reliability of the result.
For Vircell ELISA kits, laboratories should follow the validated conditions specified for the particular assay and for serum or plasma samples.
An equivocal or borderline ELISA result falls within a defined interpretation range where the sample cannot be conclusively classified as positive or negative.
Depending on the microorganism, assay and clinical context, the laboratory may need to:
- Repeat the test.
- Test a new sample collected later.
- Use a complementary diagnostic method.
- Evaluate additional serological markers.
- Correlate the result with clinical information.
The decision should always follow the interpretation criteria provided in the Instructions for Use of the specific assay.
A false-positive ELISA result can occur because of non-specific reactivity, cross-reactivity or other interference affecting the analytical reaction.
Possible causes include:
- Heterophile antibodies.
- Antibodies against related microorganisms.
- Other immunological interference.
- Non-specific reactions.
- Technical issues during processing.
The likelihood and significance of these interferences depend on the microorganism and assay design. Results should therefore be interpreted together with clinical information and other laboratory findings.
High ELISA background occurs when excessive non-specific signal remains in the wells, making it more difficult to distinguish between positive and negative results.
Possible causes include:
- Insufficient washing.
- Contamination.
- Incorrect reagent preparation.
- Inappropriate incubation conditions.
- Pipetting errors.
- Incorrect use of reagents or conjugates.
When unexpectedly high background occurs, the full procedure and assay controls should be reviewed before interpreting the run.
Poor reproducibility between duplicate ELISA wells usually indicates variability introduced during one or more processing steps.
Possible causes include:
- Inconsistent pipetting.
- Insufficient mixing.
- Uneven washing.
- Differences in incubation time.
- Contamination.
- Incorrect handling of the plate or reagents.
Standardizing the workflow and automating selected steps can help reduce this variability.
If the assay controls do not meet the acceptance criteria defined in the Instructions for Use, the run should not be considered valid until the cause has been investigated and resolved.
The laboratory should review factors such as:
- Reagent preparation and storage.
- Incubation time and temperature.
- Washing performance.
- Pipetting.
- Instrument performance.
- Correct use of controls and reagents.
The specific acceptance criteria depend on each ELISA assay.
Quality controls help confirm that an ELISA assay has performed within the established criteria before patient sample results are interpreted.
They can help detect deviations associated with reagents, instruments, pipetting or other stages of the analytical process.
In Vircell ELISA kits, controls and samples are designed to follow equivalent processing conditions, supporting consistent assay performance.
Before introducing a validated ELISA assay into routine testing, the laboratory should verify that the method achieves the required performance under its own operating conditions.
The scope of verification depends on:
- Intended use.
- Assay characteristics.
- Laboratory workflow.
- Quality management requirements.
- Applicable accreditation requirements.
For laboratories working under ISO 15189, verification should be documented according to the laboratory’s quality management system and the intended use of the assay.
Vircell provides technical and scientific documentation to support the selection, implementation and routine use of its ELISA assays.
Depending on the product, available resources may include:
- Instructions for Use through eIFU.
- Product information.
- Performance characteristics.
- Scientific literature.
- ELISA product flyers.
- Vircell Immunology Catalogue.
- Additional technical resources for registered users.
The latest documentation for each product reference should always be used as the primary source for specific assay requirements.
Yes. Vircell ELISA kits use colored, ready-to-use liquid reagents designed to simplify routine assay preparation.
Color coding also helps users identify the different components during processing.
Selected Vircell ELISA kits include semi-quantitative protocols using specific calibrators.
Availability depends on the individual assay. Laboratories should consult the Instructions for Use of the specific product to confirm whether a semi-quantitative protocol is available.
VirClia Monotest
VirClia® is Vircell’s range of chemiluminescence immunoassays (CLIA) in Monotest format for infectious disease diagnostics.
Each VirClia® Monotest allows an individual determination to be performed using ready-to-use reagents contained within the strip itself.
Currently, VirClia® Monotest assays are processed automatically on VirClia® Lotus, Vircell’s CLIA analyzer specifically designed for this assay range.
VirClia® is the range of Monotest assays, while VirClia® Lotus is the automated analyzer used to process them.
In other words, the laboratory selects the VirClia® Monotest corresponding to the parameter it wants to analyze, while VirClia® Lotus automates assay processing, from sample and strip identification to result generation and management.
VirClia® Monotest assays are currently processed on VirClia® Lotus.
VirClia® Lotus is a fully automated chemiluminescence immunoassay analyzer that combines the Monotest format with random access, continuous loading and urgent sample management.
No. VirClia® Monotest assays are designed for automated processing on VirClia® Lotus.
The instrument manages the protocols for the different VirClia® assays, sample and strip identification, assay processing and result communication.
CLIA, or chemiluminescence immunoassay, is an immunodiagnostic technique that uses a light-emitting chemical reaction to detect and measure antigen-antibody interactions.
The light signal generated during the assay is measured by the analyzer and used to determine the result according to the criteria defined for each test.
VirClia® combines CLIA technology with a Monotest format developed specifically for infectious disease diagnostics.
Monotest means that each VirClia® determination is supplied as an individual strip and can be processed independently.
This allows laboratories to run only the tests they need at a given time, without waiting to accumulate enough samples to complete a batch.
One Monotest corresponds to one reportable determination, supporting on-demand processing of both routine and lower-volume parameters.
Each VirClia® Monotest contains the reagents required to perform one individual determination, together with a calibrator and a negative control.
Each strip consists of 3 reaction wells and 5 reagent wells, which are used automatically during assay processing.
This design provides individual quality control for each Monotest.
No additional controls or calibrations are required for each VirClia® Monotest determination.
Each strip includes its own calibrator and negative control, allowing individual quality control of the determination.
This avoids the need to prepare calibration curves or consume additional controls each time a test is processed.
No. VirClia® does not require a calibration curve to be generated for each routine.
The calibrator included in each Monotest forms part of the individual control of the determination, simplifying processing and avoiding the periodic calibration procedures associated with other immunoassay formats.
Yes. The assay-specific reagents required for each VirClia® test are included in the Monotest and are ready to use.
In addition to the strips, VirClia® Lotus uses common auxiliary reagents for instrument functions such as washing and decontamination.
Most VirClia® references are supplied as kits containing 24 individual Monotests.
Some references are available in other presentations, so the specific product content should always be checked in the catalogue or product documentation.
VirClia® offers a menu of more than 95 references for the diagnosis of different infectious diseases.
The range includes parameters covering different areas of clinical microbiology and allows laboratories to combine both high- and low-demand assays on the same platform.
VirClia® includes both antibody and antigen detection assays.
Depending on the reference, the range includes IgG, IgM, IgA, combined immunoglobulin assays, quantitative assays, avidity tests and antigen detection assays.
For example, VirClia® includes assays for detecting Aspergillus galactomannan antigen and Helicobacter pylori antigen, as well as a broad range of serological tests.
The sample type depends on the specific VirClia® assay.
Many VirClia® serology assays use serum or plasma, while selected antigen detection assays may use other specimen types.
For example, VirClia® assays are available for samples including:
- Serum.
- Plasma.
- Bronchoalveolar lavage.
- Stool.
Laboratories should always consult the Instructions for Use of the specific reference to confirm validated sample types.
Yes. VirClia® Lotus allows different VirClia® parameters to be assigned to the same sample and managed within the same routine.
This facilitates serological profiles or combinations of parameters without having to process them in separate batches.
Compatibility and specific requirements depend on the individual assay.
Yes. VirClia® Lotus is designed to manage different VirClia® parameters simultaneously within the same routine.
Random access allows different tests and samples to be combined according to the laboratory’s needs instead of dedicating an entire analytical run to a single parameter.
VirClia® uses CLIA technology in a Monotest format, while ELISA typically uses a colorimetric reaction in a microplate format.
From a workflow perspective, VirClia® allows each determination to be processed individually, whereas ELISA is often particularly suitable for processing multiple samples for the same parameter in a plate-based workflow.
Vircell offers both technologies to accommodate different sample volumes, test menus and laboratory workflows.
VirClia® can be particularly useful when a laboratory needs to process different parameters without waiting to accumulate samples for a complete batch.
The Monotest format is well suited to situations such as:
- Low- or medium-demand parameters.
- Variable workloads.
- Tests received irregularly.
- Urgent samples.
- Different parameters processed within the same routine.
- Laboratories looking to consolidate more infectious disease tests onto a single platform.
Yes. The Monotest format allows laboratories to use only one strip for each determination that needs to be processed.
There is no need to open or use an entire plate to analyze only a small number of samples for a particular parameter.
In addition, the calibrator and negative control are integrated into each Monotest, avoiding additional consumption associated with calibration and routine control materials.
Yes. The VirClia® Monotest format is particularly suited to processing low-volume assays without waiting to accumulate samples.
This allows laboratories to keep selected parameters in-house and process them when needed alongside more frequently requested tests.
VirClia® kits generally have a shelf life of 15 months from the date of manufacture when stored under the specified conditions.
The expiry date and exact storage requirements should always be checked on the product label and in the Instructions for Use of the specific reference.
VirClia® kits should be stored according to the conditions specified in the Instructions for Use of each product.
As a general condition for the range, kits are stored refrigerated at 2–8 °C, unless the documentation for a specific reference states otherwise.
If the Monotest quality control does not meet the established acceptance criteria, the result should not be validated until the cause has been investigated.
The laboratory should review factors including:
- Product storage conditions and expiry date.
- Correct identification and loading of the sample and strip.
- Reagent condition.
- Instrument performance.
- Acceptance criteria specified in the Instructions for Use.
The assay should be repeated when required by the corresponding procedure.
No. Regulatory status depends on the specific VirClia® reference and the market in which it is commercialized.
The current range includes products with different regulatory classifications. The applicable status should therefore be checked individually on the product page, product label and current documentation.
The VirClia® catalogue provides the available assay menu, while Vircell’s eIFU platform gives access to the Instructions for Use and product-specific documentation.
The latest documentation for each reference should always be consulted to confirm sample types, storage conditions, assay procedure, result interpretation and regulatory status.
VirClia Lotus
VirClia® Lotus is an automated chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) analyzer for infectious disease diagnostics. It processes VirClia® assays in monotest format and allows laboratories to combine different samples and parameters within the same routine using random access and continuous loading.
VirClia® Lotus is compatible with the VirClia® infectious disease assay menu, which includes up to 94 markers and different types of qualitative, quantitative and avidity assays.
This allows laboratories to run both routine parameters and specialized or low-demand tests on the same platform.
VirClia® Lotus delivers the first results in approximately 70 minutes. After that, the system can report a new result every 35 seconds.
VirClia® Lotus can process up to 40 determinations in 90 minutes, combining different tests and samples within the same routine.
VirClia® Lotus can accommodate up to 50 primary sample tubes simultaneously, as well as 50 dilution tubes and 6 diluent bottles.
Once a sample has been dispensed, the system notifies the user so that the tube can be removed and the position used for a new sample.
Yes. VirClia® Lotus supports continuous loading, allowing new samples and reagents to be added while the instrument continues processing previously scheduled tests.
This means the laboratory does not need to stop or restart the routine whenever a new sample arrives.
Random access allows VirClia® Lotus to process different samples and tests independently, without waiting for a complete batch.
In practice, laboratories can combine different parameters, add new samples during the routine and prioritize urgent samples according to their needs.
Yes. The STAT function allows an urgent sample to be loaded while VirClia® Lotus is already running and gives it maximum processing priority.
The requested tests are incorporated into the workflow without waiting for all previously scheduled determinations to be completed.
VirClia® Lotus can assign up to 39 different parameters to the same sample, supporting multiparametric testing within a single routine.
VirClia® Lotus can work directly with primary tubes and other common laboratory tube formats. Compatible primary tubes have a diameter of 11 to 16 mm.
An adapter is also available for 2 mL conical tubes.
Yes. VirClia® Lotus includes an integrated scanner for sample and VirClia® strip identification.
Barcode reading helps maintain traceability throughout the workflow and reduces the risk of identification errors between the sample, the requested test and the reported result.
No. VirClia® Lotus uses reusable metal tips for sample and reagent dispensing.
The tips are washed internally and externally using decontamination and washing solutions between processes to help prevent cross-contamination.
Used VirClia® strips are automatically discarded into the instrument’s solid waste container.
The system can continue loading and processing new tests without requiring the user to remove each strip manually.
No additional controls or calibrations are required for each determination. The VirClia® Monotest format includes the quality control required for each assay.
This simplifies routine preparation and avoids the need for additional consumables specifically for external controls or calibrations.
Yes. Through VirCom middleware, VirClia® Lotus can store control and calibrator results and use them for quality control monitoring.
Results can be reviewed by parameter, date and product lot, and VirCom can generate quality control charts showing mean values and the corresponding ranges.
VirCom is Vircell’s middleware software for managing and communicating results generated by VirClia® Lotus.
It supports result management and acts as a connection between the analyzer and laboratory IT systems, including communication with the LIS.
Yes. VirClia® Lotus supports bidirectional LIS connectivity through VirCom middleware.
The system can receive sample information from the laboratory information system and send results back to the LIS once testing is completed, helping maintain traceability and reduce manual data entry.
Yes. VirClia® Lotus is supplied with an external touchscreen laptop used to operate and manage the system.
VirCom is used for result management and laboratory connectivity.
VirClia® Lotus requires routine and preventive maintenance to support stable long-term operation.
Laboratories have access to procedures and resources for carrying out regular maintenance tasks, while Vircell Technical Service can provide specialized support whenever required.
Indirect Immunofluorescence Assay - IFA
Indirect immunofluorescence (IFA) is an immunodiagnostic technique used to detect specific antibodies against microorganisms through a fluorescent reaction.
During the assay, antibodies present in the patient sample bind to antigens fixed on a slide. A fluorescent-labelled conjugate is then added, allowing the reaction to be visualized under a fluorescence microscope.
In infectious disease diagnostics, IFA is particularly useful when the fluorescence pattern, antibody titre or comparison between different antigens provides relevant information for interpretation.
An IFA test exposes the patient sample to an antigen fixed on a slide and uses a fluorescent conjugate to show whether specific antibodies are present.
In simplified terms, the sample is incubated with the antigen, unbound antibodies are removed by washing, and a fluorescent-labelled conjugate is added.
After a second washing step and slide mounting, the reaction is examined under a fluorescence microscope and interpreted according to the pattern and criteria defined for the specific assay.
IFA remains relevant because it allows laboratories to visually assess antibody reactivity and determine antibody titres through serial dilutions.
For some diseases, these titres or fluorescence patterns provide information that cannot be obtained in the same way from a simple positive or negative result.
In specific diagnostic settings, including Q fever and some spotted fever group rickettsioses, IFA remains an important serological reference method.
IFA can provide a qualitative result and, through serial dilutions, a semi-quantitative antibody titre.
The titre does not represent an absolute antibody concentration. It indicates the highest dilution of the sample at which the specific fluorescence defined by the assay is still detectable.
Its significance depends on the microorganism, assay and interpretation criteria.
An antibody titre in IFA is the highest dilution of a sample at which a specific fluorescent reaction can still be detected.
When a sample is tested through serial dilutions, the titre corresponds to the last dilution that still meets the assay criteria for positivity.
A higher titre means that reactivity remains detectable at a greater dilution, but it does not by itself confirm an active infection.
No. A high antibody titre does not by itself confirm an active infection.
Antibodies can remain detectable after a previous infection, and titre cut-offs have different meanings depending on the microorganism.
For certain diseases, the change in titre between two samples is more informative than a single isolated result.
Yes. An IFA test can be negative during the early stages of infection if detectable antibody levels have not yet developed.
This is particularly relevant in infections where the serological response develops after symptom onset.
When clinical suspicion remains high, a second sample collected later or a complementary diagnostic method may be required.
Paired samples are two serum samples collected at different times and used to compare changes in antibody titres.
Typically, an acute-phase sample is compared with a second sample collected during the convalescent phase.
A significant increase in titre can provide stronger evidence of a recent infection than a single isolated titre. The appropriate sampling interval and the change considered significant depend on the disease.
Seroconversion is the change from an initially seronegative sample to a later sample in which specific antibodies are detected.
When demonstrated using samples collected at different times and interpreted according to the criteria established for the infection, seroconversion can provide evidence of a recent immune response.
For some infectious diseases, a fourfold or greater rise in antibody titre between paired samples is used as evidence of recent infection, but this criterion should not be applied universally to all IFA assays.
This approach is used in diagnostic recommendations for infections such as Q fever and spotted fever group rickettsioses.
For other microorganisms, the specific interpretation criteria established for the disease and assay should be followed.
Vircell offers a range of indirect immunofluorescence assays for the serological diagnosis of different infectious diseases.
The current IFA portfolio includes assays for respiratory bacterial infections, vector-borne diseases, zoonoses and fungal infections, with parameters such as Chlamydophila pneumoniae, Legionella pneumophila, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Rickettsia conorii, Rickettsia typhi, Coxiella burnetii, Bartonella henselae, Bartonella quintana, Leishmania infantum, Trypanosoma cruzi and invasive candidiasis through CAGTA.
Vircell also offers Multitest solutions such as PNEUMOBACT and PNEUMOSLIDE.
Vircell P- reference IFA products are complete kits containing the components required to perform the assay.
Depending on the test, the kit may include slides, controls, PBS, mounting medium, conjugate and sorbent when required.
Preparation and use of each component should always follow the Instructions for Use of the specific reference.
P- references correspond to complete IFA kits, while S- references correspond to slide presentations.
P- kits provide the components required to perform the assay, whereas S- references are intended for laboratories that specifically require the corresponding substrate or antigen slide.
The sample type should always be checked in the Instructions for Use of the specific assay.
Most serological IFA assays in Vircell’s current portfolio are designed for human serum or plasma.
Exact requirements for collection, storage, dilution and sample treatment depend on the individual reference.
Vircell IFA Multitests allow antibodies against several microorganisms to be evaluated using the same slide.
Current solutions include PNEUMOBACT, which contains antigens from five bacterial agents associated with respiratory infections, and PNEUMOSLIDE, which combines bacterial and viral antigens related to respiratory infections.
This format allows several agents to be evaluated within a common workflow when differential diagnosis is required.
PNEUMOBACT is designed for antibody detection against bacterial agents associated with respiratory infections, while PNEUMOSLIDE combines both bacterial and viral antigens.
PNEUMOBACT includes Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Coxiella burnetii, Chlamydophila pneumoniae and Chlamydophila psittaci.
PNEUMOSLIDE combines different respiratory bacterial and viral agents on the same slide and is available in IgG and IgM formats.
Microimmunofluorescence (MIF) is an immunofluorescence format that allows reactivity against several antigens to be evaluated separately in different areas of the same slide.
It is particularly useful when comparing antibody responses against related microorganisms.
Vircell uses this approach in its Chlamydophila pneumoniae assays, where different Chlamydia species are presented in separate wells to support differential interpretation.
Vircell IFA assays for Chlamydophila pneumoniae include C. pneumoniae, C. trachomatis and C. psittaci in separate wells to help evaluate reactivity against related species.
This design allows the intensity of the reactions to be compared and helps laboratories consider possible cross-reactivity during interpretation.
The C. pneumoniae antigen is based on elementary bodies and is designed to support more specific evaluation of the antibody reaction.
Vircell IFA SORBENT is a reagent designed to capture human IgG and reduce interference in selected IgM or IgA IFA assays.
It is based on anti-human IgG antibodies directed against the Fc region.
It should only be used when specified in the procedure for the corresponding assay.
Yes. Vircell provides an IFA image gallery with reference examples of fluorescence patterns for different microorganisms.
The gallery includes reference images for parameters such as Coxiella burnetii, Chlamydophila pneumoniae, Rickettsia conorii, Bartonella henselae, Bartonella quintana, Leishmania infantum and other infectious agents.
These images can support interpretation, but slide reading should always follow the criteria defined in the Instructions for Use of the specific assay.
Coxiella burnetii has two antigenic phases, known as phase I and phase II, and the antibody response to these phases provides useful information in the diagnosis of Q fever.
In acute infection, the antibody response generally predominates against phase II antigen.
High or increasing IgG titres against phase I antigen may be associated with persistent focal infection or chronic forms of Q fever, but they should not be interpreted in isolation. Diagnosis requires clinical correlation and additional diagnostic criteria.
Vircell COXIELLA BURNETII I+II IFA presents phase I and phase II antigens in separate wells.
This allows the antibody response against each phase to be evaluated independently and facilitates interpretation of the C. burnetii serological profile.
Clinical classification should be based on the titre profile together with patient history and the relevant diagnostic criteria.
A single positive sample does not always confirm a recent Rickettsia infection.
Antibodies can persist following a previous infection, and cross-reactivity between related species may occur.
For some rickettsial diseases, comparing an acute sample with a convalescent sample to demonstrate a significant rise in titre provides stronger serological evidence.
Bartonella serology should be interpreted carefully because cross-reactivity between species can occur.
Vircell BARTONELLA IFA includes Bartonella henselae and Bartonella quintana in separate wells to facilitate evaluation of reactivity against both antigens.
However, as with other Bartonella serological tests, results should be interpreted together with the clinical and epidemiological context.
Background fluorescence can occur when fluorescent signal is present but does not clearly correspond to the expected specific reaction.
Possible causes include:
- Insufficient washing.
- Residual salts.
- Excessive incubation times.
- Drying of the wells.
- Contamination.
- Non-specific sample reactivity.
When high background is observed, the laboratory should review the complete procedure and confirm that the Instructions for Use have been followed correctly.
Autofluorescence is the natural emission of fluorescence by certain biological materials or slide components independently of the specific assay reaction.
It can produce signals that make it more difficult to distinguish specific from non-specific fluorescence.
Appropriate controls, correct microscope settings and an experienced observer help differentiate autofluorescence from true specific fluorescence.
Weak fluorescence may result from a low concentration of specific antibodies or from technical factors related to assay processing or slide reading.
The laboratory should review:
- Reagent preparation and storage.
- Incubation conditions.
- Washing procedures.
- Conjugate preparation.
- Microscope performance and settings.
Fluorescence intensity should always be interpreted according to the assay criteria and compared with the appropriate controls.
If no cells or fluorescence are visible, the washing procedure should be reviewed to confirm that the antigen substrate has not been damaged.
Vircell recommends:
- Using the washing solution specified for the kit.
- Following the recommended washing times.
- Avoiding direct jets of PBS or water onto the wells.
- Preventing slides from overlapping during washing.
Other assay steps should also be reviewed before concluding that there is a problem with the slide.
The appearance of Vircell Rickettsia and Bartonella slides may differ because of the antigen preparation process used during manufacturing.
Vircell removes residual Vero cell material used during the culture of these microorganisms.
The aim is to reduce non-specific fluorescence caused by antibodies that may react with residual cellular components and to support a more specific interpretation of the reaction.
A negative result at a low dilution followed by a positive result at a higher dilution should be investigated before interpretation.
This pattern may be related to technical issues such as:
- Incubation conditions.
- Conjugate drying.
- Washing problems.
- Other processing inconsistencies.
In rare cases, antibody excess phenomena may also contribute, but technical causes should be excluded first and the assay repeated according to the Instructions for Use.
IFA slides and reagents should be stored according to the specific conditions stated in the Instructions for Use of each product.
Incorrect storage can affect antigen stability, fluorescent conjugates and overall assay performance.
Conjugates and other light-sensitive components should be handled and stored according to the requirements of the individual reference.
Yes. Although the technical IFA procedure is relatively straightforward, fluorescence reading and interpretation require training and experience.
The observer must be able to distinguish between:
- Specific fluorescence patterns.
- Non-specific fluorescence.
- Autofluorescence.
- Technical artefacts.
Vircell provides technical documentation and reference images that can support slide interpretation.
Current documentation for Vircell IFA products is available through the Vircell eIFU platform and individual product pages.
Laboratories should always use the documentation corresponding to the specific product reference and lot to confirm:
- Assay procedure.
- Sample types.
- Storage conditions.
- Interpretation criteria.
No. Regulatory status depends on the specific product reference and the market where it is commercialized.
Vircell’s current IFA portfolio includes products with different regulatory classifications, so the status of each reference should be checked individually in the catalogue, product label and current documentation.
In Coxiella burnetii serology, a predominant antibody response to phase II is typically associated with acute Q fever, whereas high and persistent phase I IgG titres are particularly relevant when persistent or focalized infection is suspected, such as endocarditis or vascular infection.
Phase I and phase II are two antigenic variants of Coxiella burnetii, not two consecutive stages of Q fever. Phase I is the natural, virulent form of the bacterium and has a complete lipopolysaccharide (LPS), whereas phase II has a shorter, truncated LPS and is less virulent.
Antibodies produced during acute Coxiella burnetii infection can react strongly with phase II antigen even though natural infection occurs with phase I bacteria. The complete LPS of phase I partially masks other bacterial antigens, while these antigens are more exposed in phase II because its LPS is truncated. When phase I bacteria are processed by host cells during infection, these antigens become accessible to the immune system and generate antibodies that also react with phase II antigen.
Phase II IgM and IgG antibodies typically appear during the first weeks of acute Q fever, and phase II IgG increases during convalescence. During the early course of infection, antibody titres against phase II generally reach higher levels than those against phase I, making the phase II response particularly relevant in the serological assessment of acute Coxiella burnetii infection.
Phase I IgG antibodies are particularly important when persistent or focalized Coxiella burnetii infection is suspected. Phase I IgG may also increase during recovery from acute Q fever, but high and persistent titres are especially relevant in clinical contexts such as endocarditis or vascular infection and should be interpreted together with clinical findings and changes in antibody titres over time.
Testing antibodies against both phase I and phase II improves the interpretation of Coxiella burnetii serology. Assessing both antigenic phases and monitoring how antibody titres evolve over time helps distinguish different serological patterns and provides a more complete picture of the immune response to Q fever.
Vircell’s COXIELLA BURNETII I+II IFA IgG/IgM/IgA allows antibodies against phase I and phase II Coxiella burnetii antigens to be evaluated within the same serological approach. This supports the assessment of the different antibody patterns associated with C. burnetii infection.
AMPLIRUN® and AMPLIRUN® TOTAL
Molecular controls are reference materials used to verify that a nucleic acid detection assay is performing consistently and that its results can be interpreted with confidence.
Depending on the type of control, they can be used to monitor different stages of the molecular workflow, including nucleic acid extraction, amplification and detection.
They may also support method development, optimization and verification, performance studies and routine laboratory quality control programs.
External molecular controls allow laboratories to assess assay performance independently from the controls included by the diagnostic kit manufacturer.
This helps monitor method consistency over time and can support the detection of changes related to:
- New reagent lots.
- Nucleic acid extraction.
- Amplification and detection.
- Instrument performance.
- Changes in procedures.
- Workflow variability.
Vircell develops AMPLIRUN® and AMPLIRUN® TOTAL as external molecular controls for different levels of molecular workflow monitoring.
An internal control is part of the assay itself and helps verify the performance of an individual sample or reaction, while an external control is processed independently to monitor the performance of the method or workflow.
Internal controls are particularly useful for identifying issues such as inhibition or failures affecting an individual reaction.
External controls provide complementary information about the overall stability and consistency of the analytical system over time.
An amplification control mainly evaluates the amplification and detection stages, while an extraction control is introduced before nucleic acid extraction so that sample preparation can also be monitored.
To monitor amplification and detection, purified DNA or RNA material such as AMPLIRUN® can be used.
To evaluate a more complete workflow, including extraction, a material that can be processed similarly to a clinical sample, such as AMPLIRUN® TOTAL, is required.
AMPLIRUN® is Vircell’s range of molecular controls based mainly on purified microbial DNA or RNA for monitoring and evaluating the amplification and detection stages of molecular assays.
Most references contain the purified complete microbial genome, allowing different target regions of the microorganism to be evaluated.
The controls are supplied in lyophilized format and can be used for applications such as positive controls, assay optimization and verification, specificity studies, limit of detection studies and standard curve generation when appropriate.
AMPLIRUN® contains purified DNA or RNA from the specified microorganism, generally corresponding to its complete genome.
This provides flexibility when using different primers and probes targeting the same microorganism.
There are specific exceptions within the portfolio, so the documentation for each individual reference should always be consulted.
No. AMPLIRUN® contains purified genetic material and is not designed to simulate a complete clinical sample.
For this reason, AMPLIRUN® is mainly used to monitor or evaluate the amplification and detection stages, but it cannot directly assess microorganism extraction efficiency.
To monitor extraction as well, Vircell offers AMPLIRUN® TOTAL.
AMPLIRUN® is not the appropriate option when the aim is to evaluate extraction because it contains already purified nucleic acid.
When introduced after extraction, it can monitor mainly the amplification and detection stages.
When the objective is to assess the complete workflow from sample preparation onwards, a control such as AMPLIRUN® TOTAL should be used.
Yes. AMPLIRUN® references provide concentration information to support their use in different analytical applications.
As a general reference, the current portfolio includes DNA controls commonly within the 10,000–20,000 copies/µL range and RNA controls around 12,500–20,000 copies/µL, although some references have different concentrations.
The exact concentration should always be checked in the documentation and certificate for the specific product.
Yes. AMPLIRUN® can be used as a positive control in compatible nucleic acid amplification assays, including conventional PCR and real-time PCR.
Its purified genetic material can be used to verify that the amplification and detection stages respond appropriately to the selected target.
Yes. AMPLIRUN® controls can be used as reference material in studies designed to evaluate the limit of detection of molecular methods.
Using an appropriate experimental design and serial dilutions, laboratories can assess assay performance at different concentrations.
The control itself does not establish the limit of detection; this must be determined through an appropriately designed and documented study.
Yes. Quantified AMPLIRUN® references can be used to generate standard curves through serial dilutions when appropriate for the method and application.
This can be useful in selected quantitative studies and during the development or evaluation of molecular methods.
AMPLIRUN® is supplied in lyophilized format together with an appropriate reconstitution solution.
As a general reference:
- DNA controls are reconstituted with 100 µL.
- RNA controls are reconstituted with 50 µL.
The specific Instructions for Use of the individual reference should always be followed.
Vircell currently indicates a shelf life of up to 30 months for DNA controls and 24 months for RNA controls from the date of manufacture, provided that the specified storage conditions are maintained.
The actual expiry date of the specific product should always be checked on its label and documentation.
AMPLIRUN® TOTAL is Vircell’s range of external molecular controls based on whole inactivated microorganisms formulated in matrices designed to mimic different clinical sample types.
Because they are processed from the beginning of the workflow, they can monitor extraction, amplification and detection.
The controls are supplied in lyophilized, single-use format and at low-positive concentrations designed to provide a more representative challenge for routine molecular workflows.
The main difference is the stage of the molecular workflow that each control is designed to monitor.
AMPLIRUN®
- Contains purified microbial DNA or RNA.
- Mainly monitors amplification and detection.
- Can support performance studies, specificity studies, limit of detection studies and standard curves.
- Has a known and relatively high concentration.
AMPLIRUN® TOTAL
- Contains whole inactivated microorganisms.
- Is formulated in a matrix similar to a clinical sample.
- Is introduced before extraction.
- Can monitor extraction, amplification and detection.
- Is formulated as a low-positive control.
AMPLIRUN® is more appropriate when the aim is to evaluate amplification or develop and characterize an assay, while AMPLIRUN® TOTAL is more appropriate when the complete workflow from sample to result needs to be monitored.
For example:
- To evaluate specificity or amplification → AMPLIRUN®.
- To generate a standard curve → quantified AMPLIRUN®.
- To study limit of detection → AMPLIRUN® within an appropriate dilution study.
- To monitor extraction + amplification + detection → AMPLIRUN® TOTAL.
- To simulate a weak positive clinical sample in routine testing → AMPLIRUN® TOTAL.
Whole microorganisms require AMPLIRUN® TOTAL to go through the extraction stage before their nucleic acid can be amplified.
This means the control can identify problems that purified DNA or RNA controls cannot detect, such as inefficient extraction or failures during the initial stages of sample processing.
The matrix is designed to make the control behave more similarly to a clinical sample during processing.
Vircell currently offers AMPLIRUN® TOTAL controls in matrices such as:
- Plasma.
- Swab.
- Sputum.
- Exudate.
- Urine.
- Stool.
- Cerebrospinal fluid.
The matrix used depends on the reference and the intended application of the control.
AMPLIRUN® TOTAL is formulated at a low but detectable concentration to provide a more demanding control than material containing a very high target concentration.
The aim is to monitor workflow performance under conditions that more closely resemble a weak-positive clinical sample.
The exact concentration depends on the reference and lot and should be checked in the corresponding product documentation.
Yes. AMPLIRUN® TOTAL is supplied as a quantified low-positive control.
The quantity and units depend on the specific reference, so the Instructions for Use and lot-specific documentation should always be consulted.
The standard AMPLIRUN® TOTAL presentation contains 10 single-use lyophilized vials.
Some panels have specific configurations within those 10 vials, so the presentation of each individual reference should be checked in the catalogue.
The volume depends on the matrix and specific reference and currently ranges approximately from 200 µL to 1 mL.
This variation allows controls to be adapted to different extraction methods and platforms.
The exact volume should be checked in the technical documentation or catalogue for the specific product.
AMPLIRUN® TOTAL is supplied as a single-use control and is not designed to be divided into aliquots for multiple independent uses.
Current Vircell information indicates that, once reconstituted, the control should be kept refrigerated and used within the specified period, currently up to 12 hours, always following the Instructions for Use of the specific reference.
AMPLIRUN® TOTAL has a shelf life of up to 30 months from the date of manufacture for references that specify this condition.
The actual expiry date and storage requirements should always be checked on the product and in its Instructions for Use.
Yes. AMPLIRUN® and AMPLIRUN® TOTAL are designed as independent external controls and can be used with compatible assays from different manufacturers.
Laboratories should verify that:
- The control target is recognized by the assay.
- The matrix is appropriate for the workflow.
- The concentration is suitable for the intended application.
- The use is consistent with applicable regulatory and quality requirements.
Yes. Both formats provide broad compatibility, but the appropriate control type should be selected according to how the molecular platform works.
AMPLIRUN® contains purified nucleic acid and is mainly intended for the amplification stage.
AMPLIRUN® TOTAL can be used with platforms that process samples from extraction onwards and is compatible with numerous molecular and sample-to-result systems.
The current portfolio includes compatibility with platforms such as GeneXpert®, BD MAX™, FilmArray®, ELITe InGenius®, Vivalytic, Liaison® MDX and STANDARD™ M10, among others.
AMPLIRUN® is not the appropriate option when the aim is to evaluate the extraction stage because it contains previously purified nucleic acid.
In a sample-to-result system where the entire process from sample input needs to be monitored, AMPLIRUN® TOTAL is generally the more appropriate format, provided that a reference compatible with the assay target and sample matrix is available.
Yes. AMPLIRUN® controls can support both commercial assays and laboratory-developed methods when the control is compatible with the target and intended application.
They are designed for applications including optimization, performance studies, positive control use and verification of molecular methods.
Yes. Both formats can be used as reference materials within verification studies, but they allow different aspects of the method to be evaluated.
AMPLIRUN® can support studies involving amplification, specificity, precision, quantification or limit of detection.
AMPLIRUN® TOTAL can additionally provide information about extraction and the performance of the complete molecular workflow.
The scope and design of verification should be defined by each laboratory according to the method and its intended use.
No. Using AMPLIRUN® or AMPLIRUN® TOTAL does not by itself demonstrate compliance with ISO 15189.
ISO 15189:2022 establishes quality and competence requirements for medical laboratories. External molecular controls can form part of the quality control, verification, monitoring and documentation strategies implemented within that system.
Compliance depends on the laboratory’s complete set of procedures, records and evidence, as well as the requirements of the relevant accreditation body.
There is no single testing frequency that is appropriate for every laboratory or assay.
The frequency should be defined according to factors such as:
- Assay-associated risk.
- Method stability.
- Testing volume and frequency.
- Reagent lot changes.
- Instrument maintenance or changes.
- Regulatory and accreditation requirements.
- The laboratory’s internal quality control program.
AMPLIRUN® TOTAL can, for example, be incorporated into daily or periodic routine control strategies when established by the laboratory.
No. AMPLIRUN® and AMPLIRUN® TOTAL are supplied as non-infectious materials.
AMPLIRUN® contains purified genetic material from inactivated microorganisms, while AMPLIRUN® TOTAL contains whole inactivated pathogens.
Vircell provides inactivation documentation for these materials.
Yes. Vircell provides strain and sequence information for many AMPLIRUN® references to help laboratories assess compatibility with primers and probes.
Sequence and associated information can be accessed through the AMPLIRUN® platform for applicable references.
No. Regulatory status depends on the specific product reference.
The current portfolio includes IVDR, CE and RUO (Research Use Only) products.
Before using a control, laboratories should check the regulatory classification, intended use and commercial availability of the specific reference in their market.
Storage conditions should always follow the Instructions for Use of the specific product.
The lyophilized format is designed to support material stability and simplify transportation, but conditions before and after reconstitution may vary between references.
A single storage rule should not be applied to the entire portfolio without consulting the current product documentation.
An unexpected shift in Ct values may indicate variation somewhere in the analytical process, but the Ct shift alone cannot identify the cause.
Factors that should be reviewed include:
- Extraction performance when using AMPLIRUN® TOTAL.
- Pipetting and reaction preparation.
- Reagent condition.
- Lot changes.
- Storage conditions.
- Instrument performance.
- PCR configuration and analysis.
- Overall workflow variability.
The trend should be evaluated against the acceptance criteria established by the laboratory for that specific control and assay.
If a molecular control does not meet the defined acceptance criteria, the possible cause should be investigated before affected results are validated.
The investigation may include reviewing:
- The control material.
- Reagents and reagent lots.
- Extraction performance.
- PCR preparation.
- Instrument performance.
- Storage conditions.
The decision to repeat the run or release results should follow the laboratory’s established quality control procedures and the assay Instructions for Use.
AMPLIRUN® TOTAL can be processed repeatedly over time to assess whether a reagent lot change is associated with a meaningful change in molecular workflow performance.
Using a consistent external material allows laboratories to compare trends across different runs, lots or time periods.
The criteria used to define a significant variation should be established within the laboratory’s quality control program.
Yes. Vircell develops customized molecular controls for laboratories, IVD manufacturers, external quality assessment providers and other organizations with specific requirements.
Customized solutions can include amplification controls, extraction and amplification controls and certified negative matrices.
Vircell has more than 30 years of experience in infectious disease diagnostics and in-house biological production capabilities.
Yes. Vircell’s molecular portfolio includes negative matrices for selected applications and can also support the development of customized matrices.
Current matrix options include products related to stool, respiratory swabs and sputum.
Availability depends on the specific application and product.
Cell Culture
A cell line is a population of cells maintained under controlled laboratory conditions that can be used as a biological system for the culture and study of microorganisms, particularly viruses.
In clinical and experimental virology, cell lines can be used for viral isolation and propagation, infectivity studies, method development, antigen production, research applications and quality control procedures.
The appropriate cell line always depends on the microorganism, the intended application and the laboratory’s validated procedure.
Vircell currently offers 14 cell lines for different virology and laboratory applications.
The portfolio includes A549, B95-8, BGM, BHK-21, HEp-2, L-929, LLC-MK2, McCoy, MDCK, MDCK-SIAT1, MRC-5, RD, Vero and Vero E6.
Depending on the cell line, Vircell offers different presentations, including ready-to-use shell vials and tubes, as well as bulk formats such as flasks and cell suspensions.
The appropriate cell line should be selected according to its susceptibility to the virus of interest and the specific purpose of the laboratory procedure.
Not all viruses replicate equally well in every cell line. Selection may depend on the microorganism being cultured, the subsequent detection method, the culture format and the laboratory’s validated conditions.
Vircell provides different cell lines to support a range of clinical virology applications.
A shell vial is a small vial containing a cell monolayer grown on a coverslip and prepared for use in viral culture procedures.
The sample can be inoculated directly onto the cells, and the coverslip can subsequently be used to detect specific microorganisms using techniques such as immunofluorescence.
Vircell offers several cell lines in ready-to-use shell vial format, reducing the amount of cell culture preparation required by the laboratory.
Vircell controls the quality of its cell lines through contamination testing, microscopic evaluation of cell morphology and routine monitoring throughout the production process.
Quality controls include Mycoplasma detection using specific PCR and Hoechst staining, testing for bacterial and fungal contamination, and microscopic assessment of cell morphology.
Vircell also periodically renews its working cultures from cells stored in liquid nitrogen to help limit changes associated with prolonged cell culture.
Mycoplasma contamination is a microbial contamination that can alter cell growth, metabolism and behavior without necessarily producing visible changes in the culture.
A contaminated culture may appear normal and may not show obvious turbidity in the culture medium, so visual inspection alone cannot reliably exclude Mycoplasma contamination.
For this reason, Vircell combines specific PCR and Hoechst staining to monitor Mycoplasma in its cell line batches and subcultures.
Cell culture contamination can be reduced through appropriate aseptic technique, careful workflow organization and regular monitoring of cultures.
Key measures include:
- Using aseptic procedures when handling cultures.
- Keeping biological safety cabinets and work surfaces clean and properly maintained.
- Avoiding the sharing of reagents or materials between cultures when cross-contamination is possible.
- Correctly identifying cell lines and reagents.
- Routinely monitoring cultures for contamination.
- Separating suspicious cultures from other cell lines.
A cell culture suspected of contamination should not be used until the cause has been investigated.
Cell morphology and confluence should be assessed regularly under a microscope and compared with the expected appearance of the cell line under normal culture conditions.
Unexpected changes in cell shape, irregular growth, deterioration of the monolayer or abnormal confluence may indicate cellular stress, contamination or unsuitable culture conditions.
Morphology is an important tool for monitoring culture status, although it is not sufficient on its own to confirm the identity of a cell line.
Poor cell growth can result from problems related to the cells themselves, reagents, culture conditions or microbial contamination.
Possible causes include:
- High passage number.
- Unsuitable culture medium or supplements.
- Incorrect temperature, atmosphere or pH.
- Overconfluence.
- Microbial contamination.
- Problems during cell recovery or handling.
- Changes in incubation conditions.
- Deteriorated media or reagents.
When poor growth is observed, both the culture history and laboratory conditions should be reviewed systematically.
Cell lines should be maintained according to the specific culture, subculture and storage conditions established for each cell type.
Culture medium, supplements, temperature, atmosphere, subculture frequency and cryopreservation conditions can vary between cell lines.
For long-term preservation, cells can be cryopreserved under validated conditions. A properly documented cell bank allows laboratories to recover reference cultures when a working cell line reaches a high passage number, loses viability or becomes contaminated.
Biosafety measures should be determined through a risk assessment that considers both the cell line and the microorganisms and procedures used in the laboratory.
The required containment level should not be determined solely by the name of the cell line. The origin of the material, the microorganism being inoculated, the procedures performed and the potential generation of aerosols should also be considered.
Laboratories should apply biosafety procedures, personal protective equipment, decontamination methods and waste management practices appropriate to their activities and applicable regulations.
BRUCELLACAPT®
BRUCELLACAPT® is Vircell’s immunocapture-agglutination assay for the detection of total anti-Brucella antibodies in human serum.
It is designed for the serological diagnosis of human brucellosis and is particularly useful in evolved or chronic stages of infection and for treatment follow-up.
BRUCELLACAPT® can be used in both screening and titration protocols and provides a visual result after incubation.
BRUCELLACAPT® uses an immunocapture-agglutination method to capture human immunoglobulins and detect antibodies that react with Brucella antigen.
Patient serum and Brucella antigen are added to U-bottom wells containing anti-human immunoglobulins. During incubation, anti-Brucella antibodies produce an agglutination pattern that can be read visually.
Unlike some conventional serological workflows, BRUCELLACAPT® does not require washing or separate sample predilution, simplifying the analytical procedure.
BRUCELLACAPT® detects total anti-Brucella antibodies, including both agglutinating and non-agglutinating or incomplete antibodies.
This broader antibody detection is one of the main characteristics of the immunocapture-agglutination method and can be particularly relevant in later stages of brucellosis.
BRUCELLACAPT® is not designed to separately report individual immunoglobulin classes such as IgG, IgM or IgA; other serological techniques should be used when class-specific information is required.
BRUCELLACAPT® uses Brucella abortus antigen and can detect serological responses associated with the main smooth Brucella species that cause human brucellosis, including B. abortus, B. melitensis and B. suis.
However, the test does not identify which of these species caused the infection.
Standard serological tests based on smooth Brucella antigens are not suitable for detecting infection with rough species such as Brucella canis, which requires different diagnostic approaches.
Blocking or non-agglutinating antibodies are anti-Brucella antibodies that may not produce a strong reaction in conventional agglutination tests even though they are present in the patient’s serum.
These antibodies can become particularly relevant in prolonged or chronic forms of brucellosis, where conventional agglutination methods may underestimate the serological response.
BRUCELLACAPT® is designed to detect both agglutinating and non-agglutinating antibodies, providing a broader assessment of the anti-Brucella antibody response.
Conventional agglutination tests mainly detect antibodies that directly produce visible agglutination, while BRUCELLACAPT® uses immunocapture to detect both agglutinating and non-agglutinating anti-Brucella antibodies.
This difference can be particularly relevant in evolved or chronic disease, where incomplete or blocking antibodies may be present.
Published studies have shown BRUCELLACAPT® to perform similarly to the Coombs anti-Brucella test while providing a simpler immunocapture-agglutination workflow.
Yes. BRUCELLACAPT® is particularly recommended for the serological evaluation of chronic or evolved forms of brucellosis.
In these situations, conventional agglutination methods may be less informative because the antibody profile can include non-agglutinating antibodies that BRUCELLACAPT® is designed to detect.
Serology should nevertheless be interpreted together with the clinical presentation, epidemiological exposure and other laboratory findings, particularly in focal or complicated disease.
BRUCELLACAPT® titres should be interpreted together with the patient’s clinical presentation, epidemiological context and local seroprevalence rather than using a single titre as universal evidence of active brucellosis.
The significance of a titre can differ between endemic and non-endemic settings, and lower titres may be more relevant in populations with low background seroprevalence.
For this reason, laboratories should use the interpretation criteria defined for their setting and consider serial results when available.
Yes. BRUCELLACAPT® can be used to monitor changes in anti-Brucella antibody titres during patient follow-up.
Published studies have shown that a progressive decrease in BRUCELLACAPT® titres, together with clinical improvement, can support the assessment of a favourable response to treatment.
However, antibody titres may remain elevated for some time after recovery, so a persistent positive titre should not by itself be interpreted as treatment failure or active disease.
BRUCELLACAPT® provides a visual result after approximately 24 hours of incubation and does not require washing or a separate sample predilution step.
The assay is designed as a simple immunocapture-agglutination workflow with visual interpretation of the resulting agglutination pattern.
These characteristics reduce the number of manual processing steps compared with more complex serological procedures.
Yes. BRUCELLACAPT® supports both screening and titration protocols using the same assay format.
The BRUCAPT reference provides 96 tests when used for screening or 24 tests when used for titration.
The kit contains sufficient diluent for the titration protocol. When BRUCELLACAPT® is used in screening mode, additional SERUM DILUENT FOR BRUCELLACAPT® (Ref. B0002) is required.
IVDR
IVDR is Regulation (EU) 2017/746, the European Union regulatory framework for in vitro diagnostic medical devices (IVDs). It has applied since 26 May 2022 and replaced the previous In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices Directive (IVDD 98/79/EC).
IVDR establishes requirements covering the safety and performance of IVDs throughout their lifecycle, including risk classification, performance evaluation, clinical evidence, traceability, conformity assessment and post-market surveillance.
Certain legacy devices can still benefit from transitional provisions under specific conditions.
IVDR replaces the previous IVDD and introduces a more risk-based and comprehensive regulatory framework for in vitro diagnostic medical devices in the European Union.
One of the main changes is the introduction of four risk classes: A, B, C and D. IVDR also increases notified body involvement for many products that did not require it under IVDD and strengthens requirements for performance evaluation, clinical evidence, traceability and post-market monitoring.
As a Regulation rather than a Directive, IVDR is directly applicable across EU Member States without requiring national transposition.
IVDR classifies in vitro diagnostic medical devices into four risk classes—A, B, C and D—according to their intended purpose and the risks associated with an incorrect result.
Class A generally covers the lowest-risk devices, while Class D covers the highest-risk IVDs. Classes B and C represent intermediate levels of risk.
Classification is determined using the rules in Annex VIII of Regulation (EU) 2017/746. Most Class B, C and D devices require conformity assessment involving a notified body, while non-sterile Class A devices can generally be self-declared by the manufacturer.
IVDR primarily regulates IVD devices and the economic operators that place them on the European market, but it also affects clinical laboratories through product availability, intended use, documentation, traceability and the use of in-house tests.
Laboratories should confirm that commercial IVDs are used according to their intended purpose and current product documentation.
IVDR also establishes specific conditions for devices manufactured and used exclusively within health institutions, commonly referred to as in-house devices, under Article 5(5). These requirements are separate from laboratory accreditation requirements such as ISO 15189.
CE marking on an IVD indicates that the manufacturer has demonstrated conformity with the applicable European regulatory requirements for the device and its intended purpose.
Under IVDR, the conformity assessment depends on the device classification. For devices requiring notified body involvement, the CE marking is accompanied by the identification number of the notified body.
However, a CE-marked IVD currently available in Europe is not necessarily already certified under IVDR, because eligible legacy devices may still be legally marketed under IVDD transitional provisions. The product-specific regulatory documentation should therefore always be checked.
RUO stands for Research Use Only. An RUO product is intended for research purposes and does not have a clinical diagnostic intended purpose as a CE-marked IVD.
An RUO label therefore does not authorize the product for routine patient diagnosis as an in vitro diagnostic medical device.
If a laboratory uses research materials as part of an internally developed procedure, this is a separate regulatory and quality matter and must be assessed according to the applicable requirements for that laboratory and application.
IVDR is already applicable, but eligible legacy IVDs may continue to be placed on the European market during extended transition periods if all applicable conditions are met.
The current transition end dates are:
- 31 December 2027: Class D devices and devices covered by certain notified body certificates issued under IVDD.
- 31 December 2028: Class C devices.
- 31 December 2029: Class B devices and Class A devices placed on the market in sterile condition.
These periods apply only to eligible legacy devices that fulfil the conditions established by Regulation (EU) 2024/1860. New IVDs and non-sterile Class A devices have had to comply with IVDR since 26 May 2022.
No. Some IVDs currently available on the European market are IVDR-compliant products, while others may still be legally marketed as legacy devices under the IVDD transitional provisions.
Eligible legacy devices can remain on the market until the applicable transition deadline only when the conditions established by IVDR and its subsequent amendments are fulfilled.
For this reason, laboratories and distributors should check the regulatory status of the specific product reference rather than assuming that every CE-marked IVD has the same status.
The regulatory status of a Vircell product should be checked for the specific product reference using the latest product documentation and Vircell’s current product catalogue.
Vircell identifies regulatory status reference by reference. The current portfolio includes products already marked as IVDR, products covered by other CE regulatory status and RUO products, depending on the reference.
For this reason, laboratories and distributors should not assume that an entire Vircell product family has the same regulatory classification. Vircell’s online product catalogue and current documentation should be used to confirm the status of each product.
Vircell provides product-specific documentation to help laboratories and distributors confirm the intended use, regulatory status and correct use of its diagnostic products.
Through Vircell’s eIFU portal, users can access the current electronic Instructions for Use using the product name, reference and lot number. The portal also provides access to Certificates of Analysis (CoA) and Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) according to the information entered.
Because regulatory status can vary between references and may evolve over time, the latest documentation for the specific product should always be consulted.
IVDR and ISO 15189 address different parts of the diagnostic laboratory environment: IVDR regulates in vitro diagnostic medical devices in the European Union, while ISO 15189:2022 specifies requirements for the quality and competence of medical laboratories.
A laboratory accredited to ISO 15189 may use IVDR-compliant IVDs as part of its quality-managed workflow, but IVDR compliance of a product does not make a laboratory ISO 15189 compliant, and ISO 15189 accreditation does not replace IVDR requirements.
The two frameworks therefore complement each other but should not be treated as equivalent.